I recently switched from the RX 100 to the Sony Alpha 6400. Am very glad about that choice, but it comes with what I call »lens trouble«. While the integrated lens of the RX 100 III just did a good job and was rather powerful with f/2.8, the kit lens of the A6400 starts at lousy f/3.5, which goes up to f/4—if you zoom in just slightly—right away. I actually only bought the kit lens because the body was cheaper with the lens on and faster to get. Also, it’s still a great lens for daylight settings.
However: I never only vlog in the best daylight. And being in Sweden on a workcation, I actually most of the time don’t have great light, especially indoors. September is the time when it gets dark and moody outside, and I don’t want to rely on artificial light, if I can avoid it. So I actually need a lens that works in such situations.
Which Sony lens is best for vlogging?
So I started looking into decent and cheap lenses. And that is how I found the (in my opinion) best Sony lens for vlogging. (Also consider a Tamron, they are good enough for amateurs—and 99% of YouTubers are amateurs, I include myself—and have a nice price-point.) In my opinion, the best lens for vlogging is the Sony 20:f/2.8 wide-angle prime lens (model number SEL20F28).
Sony does not make many lenses better than f/2, and f/2.8 is a very decent f-number. In fact, I think that f/1.X lenses are highly overrated. Sure, it’s great in the dark. But you don’t need it for vlogging, and don’t tell me you need it for that shallow depth of field.
Most wide-aperture lenses are a total overkill for vloggers, while the A6400 kit-lens sadly is kind of an »underkill«, I guess…
LOL, no, my friend. You really don’t need a f/1.X lens. Have you even checked the difference between f/1.8 and f/2.8? How do you know you even care and are not just a victim of »grearitis«? Come on, let’s have some real talk.—So, here is where I’m coming from. I worked with a f/1.4 Nikkor my »entire life« (and many other lenses). And I actually did professional photo shoots with that thing, because it is such an amazing prime lens. But still, I would say, I did not need the f/1.4 aperture most of the time. And neither do you.
Especially when it comes to YouTube videos. Because you don’t want to blur out your surroundings completely, a lot of th time. You probably want your audience to see a little bit of your backdrop or the room you are in. You want them to have a feeling for where you actually are.
In macro situations, it is similar as well. So much detail is lost with wide-open aperture shots. In my opinion, it looks just boring. It looks like a beginner photographer wasted their money to play with the aperture priority setting, that’s what it looks like. 1% of all standard photography situation—let alone something as primitive as vlogging—do not call for a f/1.X lens. They simply don’t. But here is an overview of why I needed an f/2.8 lens and not an f/3.5-X:
Reasons you need a wide aperture prime lens
- less noise in low light
No, ma’am, I don’t have 1800€ for a wide-angle zoom lens, and I don’t wan to vlog on a 0.5 kg lens anyway. I can only imagine how frustrating it would be to save all that money, then spend it on that ridiculous lens boner, just to find out that I’m not the hulk after all? No thank you.
So I opted for a prime lens and I am pretty happy with it. Yes, it’s a bit wide-angly, as in:
- You might need to bring the camera to a distance from your face you like
- It looks a bit fish-eyish, but not that much that it is very disturbing, unless you bring straight objects very close to the lense (as in < a few meters)
So what this lens is perfect for in my opinion, and what makes it the best Sony lens for vlogging, is:
- Excellent in evening light situations
- Silent autofocus (all of the Sony lenses apart from that nifty 50 mm one have that, dang…!)
- Good enough for macros, aka some b-roll on the side
The main argument of zoom lens advocates is wrong
For vlogging—in most cases—people will recommend a wide-angle zoom lens. And that is a reasonable thought. However, most zoom lenses for the A6400 are not budget lenses (as in made for beginner YouTubers that depleted their savings by buying the camera body). Also, the zoom is not even needed in most scenarios. In my opinion, it is pretty overrated. Use that money and get a good tripod.
A zoom lens as good as the one on the RX 100 is simply not available at that price-point for the A6400. Get it out of your head. That lens does not exist. The kit lens is worse than the whole Sony RX 100. Like seriously, just buy an RX 100 and take it with you next to the A6400, because it is both lighter and cheaper! No, I’m not even kidding. That would be the mother of all budget solutions. Also, for just vlogging, the RX 100 is completely sufficient. A decent camera. Nobody needs 4K. You’re not a pro. You’re not Peter McKinnon. And you also don’t need a 2000€ drone.
Sorry, I needed to say that. Because so many people out there get caught up in equipment, with zero editing skills, no talent for story telling and 50 views on their 3 videos.
»The first principle is that you must not fool yourself — and you are the easiest person to fool.«Richard P. Feynman
Aww… I love when I have a good excuse to quote a fellow physicist and writer of many books I enjoyed!
Okay, now lets move on to my final thoughts on this lens…
Why prime lenses for vlogging?
Well, prime lenses are cheap, easy to use and light. And when exactly do you really need that zoom anyway? Tell me one situation really. One that does not expose you as a total noob that should have gotten an RX100 in the first place. Tell me all about it. Because I certainly never ever need it when I’m vlogging. The Sony RX 100 is made to be taken out of your pocket and go »point and shoot«. That is the type of camera it is. It’s not made to be taken out of your bag and then you zoom around until you have the perfect frame. Literally nobody does that. (If you do, you’re a total weirdo. Not a nerd. Just a weirdo.) Don’t overthink it. Concentrate on your words, not your lens, right?
So why would you expect a system camera to be like that? Why would you start missing a feature you don’t even use 90% of the time, because you point at things or your face anyway? And even if you use the zoom occasionally, why not just get closer to the object in those situations, huh? Or… because now you have a system camera… actually switch to a different lens, like a real photographer…!
System cameras aren’t »point-and-shoots«
But system cameras aren’t really like that. Inherently, they are way more complicated. And it is foolish to believe that you can have what you had with an integrated lens. You can not. You need to think like a photographer/videographer if you want to vlog with a system camera. They are the little sisters of DSLRs and they want to be taken seriously.
So treat the system with respect and adapt. I got it out of my head in less than two days that it would be possible to ever do everything with just one lens. There is no one lens anymore with a system camera. Kiss that thought goodbye and move on. What you need to understand instead is that this new versatility is power. With a camera like the A6400 you actually have the possibility to switch to a lens that fits the situation and not just be stuck with what you have. That is more power, but also more trouble. But cameras like this are made to be used with different lenses, not made to be bought with a kit lens and then you never take that one off. Like why? Who would want that? And why would you pay a 1000 bucks for it? That would be so incredibly stupid and short-sighted. Enjoy that beautiful good camera and work it!
So, I totally made my peace with the fact that I have to switch lenses, that the sensor might get dirty, the lens might get dirty, the other lens too, and that I have to carry it all with me. Well, you know how annoying all of this was in the early 2000s, when we only had shitty DSLRs that weren’t even as good as any of those mirrorless babies today? I started out on a D80. If you don’t know what that is, thank your parents!
But what do you combine that prime lens with?
First of all, you might not even need another lens (especially a zoom lens) constantly. Just think about it: What did photographers do in the olden days? They were flexible—because their gear wasn’t. It was heavy and expensive. So if your prime doesn’t show what you want to show: get the f_ck closer to the object. Or step back. If you can’t do that, switch the lens. I have a 50 mm (full frame) lens and the kit lens, next to my 20 mm (APS-C) vlogging lens. That is all I need for now.
If I’d get a zoom lens at some point, it would certainly not be a Sony lens. I’d directly go for a Tamron or some other budget option. The Sony lenses on the market are so good, they are pro lenses, and I am not a pro. It’s important to know your limits and stick to them.
For example, I never even cared about the 4K option. I don’t do stabilization in post (I’d rather buy a gimbal). I don’t want people to see all my skin impurities. And I don’t give a crap about huge landscape prints. I’m not Peter McKinnon, and neither are you. So don’t act like you’re about to become him. Also, I assume that he probably doesn’t put up with a Sony Alpha anyway…
Videographers can learn a lot from photographers, and it doesn’t have to be expensive
Good. Now that I have shared all my opinion on this, feel free to tell me yours. Keep in mind that this is not my first Sony or system camera and that photography/videography styles are very different and personal. I like it simple, and maybe that is why I like a good prime better than a lousy zoom. Just think about it, you might find that it’s not that dumb of an idea!
Because I believe that a lot of YouTubers think that videography is so different from photography. But it actually isn’t. For me, in the beginning, it was really hard. And I am still working on my technique and style. I am by far not great at this. But I am getting a hang of it and I want to share my experience to help you guys out. Don’t waste your money. Don’t be a fool. Videographers can learn a lot from photographers’ technique. So I try to bring my knowledge from that into filmmaking and vlogging, to create nicer videos.
Still, shooting photos comes much more natural to me. I like the viewfinder more than the screen. I enjoy being behind the camera better than standing in front of it. I prefer to show things, not talk about them. But I still want to make vlogs and I like video a lot. I like the social aspect of YouTube and the community that comes with being a YouTuber. And I truly think that you don’t need to spend a fortune to join the club here!